<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linkedin adds rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221; to profile links &#8211; SEO News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kingpin-seo.co.uk/webmaster-magazine/linkedin-adds-relnofollow-to-profile-links-seo-news/01155/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kingpin-seo.co.uk/webmaster-magazine/linkedin-adds-relnofollow-to-profile-links-seo-news/01155</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:35:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://www.kingpin-seo.co.uk/webmaster-magazine/linkedin-adds-relnofollow-to-profile-links-seo-news/01155/comment-page-1#comment-5518</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 17:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingpin-seo.co.uk/webmaster-magazine/?p=155#comment-5518</guid>
		<description>Im seeing &#039;no follow&#039; on the &#039;my company&#039; link in my Linkedin public profile but the &#039;my blog&#039; listings underneath seem like they are &#039;do-follows&#039;, admittedly im just using browser SEO extensions/add ons/plug ins that highlight no follows in red rather than a thorough analyis.  The &#039;my blog&#039; entries are not highlighted as &#039;no follows&#039;

Can anyone else confirm if they are seeing the same on their linked in public profile web site listings i.e. listing a site in &#039;my blog&#039; may actually be followed ?

On a side note re facebook, i note that the first website listed in ones info section is now published on your public profile and isnt showing as a &#039;no-follow&#039; hence i presume is a &#039;do-follow&#039; ?

Anyone able to confirm/comment ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im seeing &#8216;no follow&#8217; on the &#8216;my company&#8217; link in my Linkedin public profile but the &#8216;my blog&#8217; listings underneath seem like they are &#8216;do-follows&#8217;, admittedly im just using browser SEO extensions/add ons/plug ins that highlight no follows in red rather than a thorough analyis.  The &#8216;my blog&#8217; entries are not highlighted as &#8216;no follows&#8217;</p>
<p>Can anyone else confirm if they are seeing the same on their linked in public profile web site listings i.e. listing a site in &#8216;my blog&#8217; may actually be followed ?</p>
<p>On a side note re facebook, i note that the first website listed in ones info section is now published on your public profile and isnt showing as a &#8216;no-follow&#8217; hence i presume is a &#8216;do-follow&#8217; ?</p>
<p>Anyone able to confirm/comment ?
<div class="crfp-rating crfp-rating-0"></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freelance Seo</title>
		<link>http://www.kingpin-seo.co.uk/webmaster-magazine/linkedin-adds-relnofollow-to-profile-links-seo-news/01155/comment-page-1#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Freelance Seo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 22:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingpin-seo.co.uk/webmaster-magazine/?p=155#comment-83</guid>
		<description>I accidentally wrote hmassive comment to this post, but sent it as an SEO quote!!! Dam it!

To sum up my view:

- Google has further proved how important links are for rankings by hounding large websites to convert to nofollow.
- Twitter and FB did the same, after being hounded by Google.
- But where are webmaster supposed to get link juice from these days? Now everybody uses twitter to share information, people are less likely to blog about a post by and link to your site! The introduction of &quot;bit.ly&quot; links simply sucks up link juice by getting in between the landing site and twitter.

Link building has morphed again! Goodbye link baiting.............</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I accidentally wrote hmassive comment to this post, but sent it as an SEO quote!!! Dam it!</p>
<p>To sum up my view:</p>
<p>- Google has further proved how important links are for rankings by hounding large websites to convert to nofollow.<br />
- Twitter and FB did the same, after being hounded by Google.<br />
- But where are webmaster supposed to get link juice from these days? Now everybody uses twitter to share information, people are less likely to blog about a post by and link to your site! The introduction of &#8220;bit.ly&#8221; links simply sucks up link juice by getting in between the landing site and twitter.</p>
<p>Link building has morphed again! Goodbye link baiting&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.
<div class="crfp-rating crfp-rating-0"></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

